Excerpts from the noteworthy news
coverage, at the JIP, Washington, updated by the scholarly American journalist, attorney
and author Andrew Kreig. Andrew is Director of the Washington-based Justice
Integrity Project and a guest contributor in the Professors
blogg. He is also a guest contributor in the Huffington Post and a
sample of his important work related to the Swedish case against Julian
Assange, is listed in the Resource section of the Justice
For Assange site. His latest article in these columns was the must read piece
WikiLeaks Claims
Secret U.S. Charges Against Assange.
A news coverage
presented by Andrew
Kreig
Guardian (United Kingdom), Julian Assange's
lawyer 'prevented from boarding flight at Heathrow,' April 19,
2012. A lawyer for the WikiLeaks founder, Julian Assange, has said she was
stopped at Heathrow airport and told she was on a watch list requiring official
approval before she could return to her native Australia. Jennifer Robinson,
right, said a member of airport security told her she "must have done
something controversial" and that they would have to contact the
Australian high commission in London before letting her on her flight. The
Australian human rights lawyer was later allowed on to a plane bound for
Sydney, where she is due to speak at the Commonwealth Law Conference on Friday.
Human Right Lawer Jennifer Robinson, also guest contributor in the Professors blogg
Wayne Madsen Report, NSA spying operation
targeting journalists focused but massive, April 20, 2012.
(Subscription required.) National Security Agency (NSA) sources have reported
the following to WMR: The NSA has conducted a targeted but massive surveillance
operation against certain journalists who have routinely exposed NSA's illegal
domestic communication surveillance program, code-named STELLAR WIND.
AlterNet / OpEd News, How Obama Became
a Civil Libertarian's Nightmare, Steven Rosenfeld, April 18,
2012. Obama has expanded and fortified many of the Bush administration's worst
policies. When Barack Obama took office, he was the civil liberties
communities’ great hope. Obama, a former constitutional law professor, pledged
to shutter the military prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and run a transparent
and open government. But he has become a civil libertarian’s nightmare: a
supposedly liberal president who instead has expanded and fortified many of the
Bush administration’s worst policies, lending bipartisan support for a more
intrusive and authoritarian federal government.
President Obama now has power
that Bush never had. Foremost is he can (and has) order the killing of U.S.
citizens abroad who are deemed terrorists. Like Bush, he has asked the Justice
Department to draft secret memos authorizing his actions without going before a
federal court or disclosing them....Meanwhile, more than a decade after the
9/11 attacks, Washington’s wartime posture has trickled down into many areas of
domestic activity—even as some foreign policy experts say the world is a much
safer place than it was 20 years ago, as measured by the growth in free-market
economies and democratic governments. Domestic law enforcement has been
militarized—as most visibly seen by the tactics used against the Occupy
protests and also against suspected illegal immigrants, who are treated with
brute force and have limited access to judicial review before being deported.
One of Bush’s biggest civil liberties breaches, spying on virtually all
Americans via their telecommunications starting in 2003, also has been
expanded. Congress authorized the effort in 2006. Two years later, it granted
legal immunity to the telecom firms helping Bush—a bill Obama voted for. The
National Security Agency is now building its largest data processing center
ever, which Wired.com’s [James Bamford] reports will go beyond the public
Internet to grab data but also reach password-protected networks. The federal
government continues to require that computer makers and big Web sites provide
access for domestic surveillance purposes. More crucially, the NSA is
increasingly relying on private firms to mine data, because, unlike the
government, it does not need a search warrant. The Constitution only limits the
government searches and seizures.
The government’s endless wartime
footing is also seen in its war on whistleblowers. Obama has continued cases
brought by Bush, such as going after the "leaker" in the warrantless
wiretapping story broken by the New York Times in 2005, as well as the
WikiLeaks case, prosecution of Bradley Manning, and others for allegedly
mishandling classified materials related to the war on terrorism. Its
suppression of war-related information given to journalists extends overseas,
where the State Department this month has blocked a visa for a Pakistani critic
from speaking in the U.S. The White House also recently pressured Yemen’s
leader to jail the reporter who exposed U.S. drone strikes. Meanwhile, the
administration has stonewalled Freedom of Information Act requests,
particularly the Justice Department, which has issued the secret wartime memos.
How bad is it? Anthony Romero, the
ACLU executive director, exclaimed in June 2010 that Obama “disgusted” him.
Meanwhile, the most hawkish Bush administration officials have defended and
praised Obama.
Last summer, liberal lawyer-journalist Glenn Greenwald tallied
a list of Bush warrior endorsements. Jack Goldsmith, the former DOJ officials
who approved the torture and domestic spying efforts, wrote in The New Republic
in May 2009 that Obama actually was waging a more effective war on terror than
Bush. “The new administration has copied most of the Bush program, has expended
some of it, and has narrowed only a bit,” Goldsmith wrote. “Almost all of the
Obama changes have been at the level of packaging, argumentation, symbol and
rhetoric.”
Bush’s final CIA director, General Michael Hayden—whose confirmation
Obama opposed as a senator—told CNN there was a “powerful continuity between
the 43rd and 44th presidents.” And in early 2011 Vice-President Dick Cheney
told NBC News, “He’s learned that what we did was far more appropriate than he
ever gave us credit for while he was a candidate.”
“We are witnessing the bipartisan
normalization and legitimization of a national security state,” Jack Balkin, a
liberal Yale University Law School professor, told the New Yorker in a 2011
feature about a prominent NSA whistleblower. “The question is not whether we
will have a surveillance state in the years to come, but what sort of state we
will have,” he wrote in a prescient law review article published early in
Obama’s presidency.
The larger dangers, Balkin said, was that the government
is creating a “parallel track of preventative law enforcement that bypasses
traditional protections in the Bill of Rights.” Moreover, he worries
“traditional law enforcement and social services will increasingly resemble the
parallel track.” And because the Constitution only restricts government
actions, not “private parties, government has increasing incentives to rely on
private enterprise to collect and generate information for it.”
FireDogLake, The
Ever-Expanding Surveillance State That Has Grown Under Obama,
Kevin Gosztola Friday April 20, 2012. The surveillance state in the United
States has only grown in America since the September 11th attacks. It has increasingly
been used to spy and intrude on the lives of journalists and activists. And,
during a Democracy Now! special, a full hour was spent delving into the
National Security Agency’s evolution into an entity that illegally collects and
sifts through private emails, cell phone calls and possibly Internet searches
and other personal data of Americans.
Jacob Appelbaum, Computer Science Researcher, University of Washington
The special also looked closely at the
stories of two individuals that have been targeted by the Homeland Security
Department—journalist Laura Poitras, who has directed documentaries on the Iraq
War and Yemen, and computer security researcher Jacob Appelbaum, who once
served as a stand-in for Julian Assange at a hackers conference. NSA
whistleblower William Binney, in his first television interview since he resigned
from the NSA, explains that the fact a telecommunications company, AT&T,
was now providing approximately 320 million records—long distance data from
citizens’ billing records—to the government led him to leave the agency.
This
was a violation of the Constitution, the pen register law, the Stored
Communications Act, the Electronic Privacy Act, the Intelligence Acts of 1947
& 1978 and other federal laws governing telecommunications. Binney
talks about going to the Intelligence Committee to raise concern before he
resigned. Porter Goss, who was chairman of the committee at the time,
essentially shrugged off an effort to look into what the NSA was doing. He
thought any questions should be taken to Michael Hayden, then-head of the NSA.
It was the Intelligence Committee’s job to “do the oversight on all this
domestic spying.” The Committee was setup to provide “oversight over the
intelligence community to make sure they didn’t monitor US citizens.” It was
setup in the “fallout of the Church Committee back in the 70s.” But, nothing
was really being done about the illegal operations of the NSA. And then, on
July 26, 2007, about twelve FBI agents raided his home with their guns drawn.
Binney was in the shower. His son answered the door. They pushed past him and,
when they found him in the bathroom, pointed a gun at his head to make sure he
was “duly intimidated.”
Democracy Now! Whistleblower:
The NSA is Lying–U.S. Government Has Copies of Most of Your Emails,
Amy Goodman, April 2012. (Video interview.) National Security Agency
whistleblower William Binney reveals he believes domestic surveillance has
become more expansive under President Obama than President George W. Bush. He
estimates the NSA has assembled 20 trillion "transactions" — phone
calls, emails and other forms of data — from Americans. This likely includes
copies of almost all of the emails sent and received from most people living in
the United States. Binney talks about Section 215 of the USA PATRIOT Act and
challenges NSA Director Keith Alexander’s assertion that the NSA is not
intercepting information about U.S. citizens.
This interview is part of a
4-part special. Click here to see segment 1, 2, and 4. [Transcript to come.
Check back soon.] William Binney, served in the NSA for over 30 years,
including a time as director of the NSA’s World Geopolitical and Military
Analysis Reporting Group. Since retiring from the NSA in 2001, he has warned
that the NSA’s data-mining program has become so vast that it could
"create an Orwellian state."
1 comment:
Maybe one answer (part answer) to NSA, Inhibited Person's Listings and so on, could be a central, public and easily accessible organization for all victims affected by these listings. (Victims of Inhibited Person's Listings ) Organized say by Jennifer Robinson, well known and highly respected in all quarters.
A safeguard, securing a balance in this regard must be created.
Yours etc
OlofM
Post a Comment